|Juniper on the rock cliff, MT|
A couple of posts ago I invited anyone who wanted to the paint the photo of the sandstone cliffs in southeastern Montana to send me their images and I would post them. I was happy to get one from Mario who took time away from his Soft Pastel News site to paint the cliffs and to also get an image from another blogger and artist Erica. It is fun to see the difference of interpretation between the 3 of us. I know Mario told me he did a really pretty quick sketch in about 40 minutes. I spent about an hour on mine. Erica didn't say how long she spend working on hers. I am happy to share these...thanks so much Mario and Erica!
So here is an observation if not a lesson in lighting from my perspective and I am referencing my work in this... I painted mine in the studio where I use daylight bulbs in the lights. I then photographed it in the same light. I tried a few different camera settings and in all of them, the rocks have this warm look to them. I do believe that if I take this image outside and shoot it again, the tones would be different. There was no flash with this one, but it almost has that appearance. I don't normally shoot images in the studio light, but rather go outside and shoot them in the actual daylight. However, this is November and it was about 6 p.m. when I finished this - and this time of year, in this part of the world it is quite dark outside at that time of day!
I have done paintings that when you photograph them, the color alters enough that it just is not right. I have taken the same image with 2 different cameras and gotten 2 different looks as well...in studio light and in daylight. When I photography out of doors, I usually do that with a neutral background and in a covered patio area so there is not direct sunlight, but still good light available for the shot. This usually gives me what I need.
Just last week I looked at the entries for the Northwest Paste Society International Show on line. Then on Saturday I got to see the show at the gallery. One thing that I noticed on not just one, but several was how different the images on the monitor looked when compared to what was printed in the catalog and when compared again to the actual image. It just made me think that when one is taking digital images of your work for a show, try your best to get the image you see to be as close as possible to what that painting is! Maybe enlist the help of a professional photographer if you are trying to get an image to send to a show...you really want it to be a true representation of your work.
So this is the beginning of the series 50 off the 90...as far as being off the 90...this was pretty far. It wasn't that the distance was huge, but it was on a dirt road about 50 miles from the interstate. There was no gravel on the road, just a graded dirt road that boasted a road sign that said something like "road is impassable when raining or during the winter months." I know this to be true. This dirt is "gumbo" which when wet, will gather more and more mud until you can go no further. My mother one time said she thought you could use gumbo like clay and do a sculpture with it. She tried and it worked. She fashioned some horses and some people out of the mud. They held up pretty well, never were fired - but she made her point! Her sculptures were often a topic of conversation and the consensus was that gumbo was good for something!
There wasn't a lot of color in this particular place...it was just interesting. This image was another that I will photograph outside again, even though this is a pretty close example of the actual painting. Both of these paintings today were done on Wallis paper that I tones with orange pastel. I used mostly Sennelier and Diane Townsend pastels on these.
So with all this being said....thank you again Mario and Erica for sharing your work. My best to you all and keep painting....